Logo for print Skip to main content
Toggle navigation MENU MORE


Bracewell has one of the nation’s leading litigation practices. For over 70 years, our lawyers have been handling almost every type of commercial dispute, earning the respect of both judges and our adversaries. We have built our reputation on winning our clients’ toughest and most significant litigation, and excel as well at handling their routine disputes.

Our outstanding courtroom advocacy, creative thinking and grit continue to receive extraordinary recognition. Chambers USA (2018) characterized us as a “fast-growing litigation bench with a reputation for creative approaches to disputes both before and in trial for a range of major corporate clients.”  Texas Lawyer named our team the Large Law Firm Litigation Department of the Year in 2017.  Legal 500 (2016) called us a “litigation powerhouse,” noting our “broad range of high-value disputes.” Law360 (2016) likewise recognized our leading litigation practice, naming us to its inaugural list of Litigation Powerhouses, which identified the top 50 litigation practices in the nation. Law360 (2016) further highlighted Bracewell as being part of an “elite group” of only five firms with fewer than 200 litigation attorneys included on its list of “litigation heavyweights.”

Access our Litigation Insights

Bracewell’s appellate practice and lawyers are recognized nationally and regionally by publications such as Chambers USA (Warren W. Harris, 2006-2018; Jeffrey L. Oldham, 2018) and The Legal 500 United States (Warren W. Harris, 2014-2017; Jeffrey L. Oldham, 2014, 2016-2017). The group is headed by one of Texas’ most experienced appellate lawyers, and includes a former law clerk on the U.S. Supreme Court and former law clerks on other federal and state appellate courts. Our lawyers have briefed and presented oral argument before the U.S. Supreme Court, the Supreme Court of Texas, federal courts of appeals nationwide, and state appellate courts throughout Texas. Bracewell’s appellate team has a wealth of experience in high-stakes commercial cases and in a wide variety of subject-matter areas, including energy, environmental, insurance, and intellectual property.

Clients rely on Bracewell’s appellate lawyers to analyze legal issues rigorously and creatively, write briefs that are sophisticated yet readable, and efficiently use the limited time at oral argument to persuade judges on the most critical points. We are frequently sought to handle appellate work from clients represented in the trial courts by other firms. We also regularly join a client’s legal team early in order to shape strategy and preserve error with a view towards success on appeal.

Bracewell’s construction litigation team brings first chair courtroom experience and technical industry knowledge to construction disputes, representing clients in state and federal courts and in arbitration proceedings. Clients reported to Chambers USA 2016 that our “dedicated, professional and knowledgeable” construction team “handles difficult situations with professionalism.” In addition to litigation and arbitration matters, we counsel an array of owners, product manufacturers, homebuilders, general contractors, and design professionals in internal investigations and in developing strategies to minimize or resolve potential claims without undermining business objectives and relationships.

Bracewell’s labor and employment group has great depth of experience in litigation, with trial experience including Federal Labor Standards Act  (FLSA) collective actions, complex Employee Retirement Income Securities Act (ERISA) litigation, and employment discrimination jury trials. Bracewell takes a business-minded approach to employment litigation and has an exceptional record of avoiding trials with successful dispositive motions and favorable settlements. In situations in which it is appropriate for a case to go to trial, Bracewell’s team is ready. In addition to employment trial experience, Bracewell’s team has substantial jury experience in non-labor matters, including criminal proceedings.

Blending its specialist sector focus and know-how, our international energy disputes team handles matters spanning the full energy spectrum around the globe. In oil and gas, our lawyers advise on disputes concerning all aspects of the upstream, midstream and downstream sectors, including exploration, production, transportation, pricing, refining, processing and marketing. In the power industry, we are trusted advisors to clients involved in both conventional and non-conventional power disputes, including generation, transmission, networks and related infrastructure. Our international energy disputes team presents a comprehensive suite of dispute resolution services, drawing in particular on its extensive experience in leading all forms of complex, high-stakes investigations, litigation and international arbitration proceedings, including under the ICC, UNCITRAL, ICSID, SIAC, HKIAC, SCMA, LMAA, GAFTA, CIETAC, DIFC and LCIA rules.

Bracewell’s energy focus—We Know Energy®—extends to our trial lawyers, who excel in disputes involving issues unique to the energy industry. In the oil and gas arena, we have fought and won cases involving joint operating agreements, development agreements, royalty disputes, title disputes, surface use agreements, environmental issues, damaged well bores, and oilfield intellectual property, including patents and trade secrets. Our power practice includes representing some of the largest power producers in the world in litigation and arbitrations throughout the United States and before state and federal regulatory bodies. From cross-border disputes to renewables, our team has addressed every major issue faced by the power industry. 

Legal 500 (2016) remarked on the firm’s "stellar client base of leading energy companies," and Chambers USA (2016) reported our clients' respect for our "knowledge of the industry," characterizing Bracewell as "[a] leading firm with highly impressive expertise across the range of energy work."

Recognizing that many industries face ever higher expectations for compliance with state and federal mandates, ESG assists companies in developing, implementing, and continually improving strategies for cost-effective compliance with all major state and federal environmental programs. We represent clients in enforcement proceedings and incident investigations, including parallel civil and criminal actions in high-profile matters. Our attorneys are also widely recognized for their strength in auditing, audit disclosures, and compliance management systems. In the litigation context, we are able to combine the experience and talents of our nationally-recognized environmental regulatory practitioners with our seasoned trial lawyers, drawing on decades of experience in the courtroom as well as familiarity with the regulatory and technical details on which these cases often turn.

Bracewell’s financial institutions litigation practice draws upon the firm’s full global resources in areas of law that directly impact financial institutions. In every matter we handle, we develop a strategic plan that aligns with the clients’ goals and meets expectations as efficiently as possible. We represent U.S. and international banks, thrifts, trust companies, broker-dealers, specialty finance organizations, and private equity groups. We have years of broad and diverse experience representing financial institutions and financial services industry clients in complex litigation, arbitration, and mediation. We work closely with our transactional and regulatory lawyers to advise our clients of risks in the current environment so that they are able to avoid future litigation. 

Bracewell’s IP lawyers combine their litigation and technology experience to provide efficient and effective representation of our clients in complex IP matters in venues across the United States, including the United States International Trade Commission (ITC) and the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Our team members, many of whom are registered patent attorneys with advanced technical degrees, are able to present persuasively technical details to judges and juries, and represent U.S. and international companies in a variety of industries including computer, software, energy, media, retail, telecommunications, and finance.

Public and private companies, boards of directors, committees of boards, individual directors, and individual officers regularly turn to Bracewell to defend them in all aspects of securities litigation. Our practice includes defending securities fraud class actions, fiduciary duty claims, shareholder derivative actions and M&A, proxy and corporate governance litigation. Bracewell’s securities litigators have represented clients in numerous federal and state courts across the country, including Delaware. Our securities litigators conduct audit committee and special litigation committee investigations in response to shareholder, governmental and internal demands. Our teams are prepared to take our cases to trial, recognizing in reality that many cases in the securities arena are dismissed at the pleading stage or otherwise are resolved prior to trial. Lawsuits, claims and investigations frequently run on a parallel basis, and our team is adept at managing all aspects of these actions to optimize efficiency and results.


Recent Notable Matters

Apache Corporation — Plaintiff landowners filed suit against Apache claiming their land was contaminated by NORMs (naturally occurring radioactive materials) during oil and gas operations dating back to the 1950’s. Bracewell gutted plaintiffs’ damage model in summary judgment, and then proceeded to obtain final judgment in favor of Apache on all issues.

ASARCO LLC — Sterlite agreed to buy ASARCO’s assets out of bankruptcy and reneged. The case went to trial where it was established that Sterlite had breached, and a $132.75 million damage award was obtained.

BG Group US — In two related arbitrations, we established BG’s right not to pay for unused midstream transportation capacity, and the obligation of the operator to market all hydrocarbons produced.

Eni S.p.A. — Bracewell defeated entirely a $6.4 billion claim against our client Eni for the value of an oil and gas concession off the coast of West Africa.

GDF Suez Energy North America — Participants in the U.S. energy futures derivatives market alleged that our client GDF Suez used its bidding strategy to manipulate the market, causing them to suffer tens of millions of dollars in damages. Bracewell conducted an aggressive defense of GDF, developing a comprehensive motion to dismiss that the district court granted in full.

Layline Petroleum — Our client Layline Petroleum sold oil and gas interests to Wapiti Oil & Gas for $375 million; a dispute arose over the post-closing purchase price adjustment. In arbitration we prevailed on our opponent’s claim for a downward reduction, and in fact achieved an upward increase.

MS Financial, Inc. — Our client MS Financial, a bank holding company, was sued by its shareholders alleging fraud and breach of fiduciary duty arising from the sale of the assets of one of its banks to a group of insiders. After we convinced the court to dismiss the core claims, the plaintiffs settled the remaining claims.

Mueller Chen & Co. — Energy investment bank Mueller Chen & Co. represented Hong Kong-based United Energy Group in its acquisition of BP’s oil and gas assets in Pakistan for around $800 million. IEVM claimed it was owed a $46.5 million success fee following the acquisition. We obtained the dismissal of all claims against our client Mueller Chen & Co., a victory which was affirmed by the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals.

Vopak Terminal Deer Park — Vertical, a Brazilian ethanol trading company, asserted claims for breach of contract and fraud against our client Vopak and sought damages of $30 million plus punitives and attorney’s fees. Following dramatic revelations obtained by Bracewell from Vertical’s own witnesses and documents, Bracewell obtained the complete dismissal of the case one week before trial.

Waste Management, Inc. — In one of the largest environmental enforcement cases ever tried, Bracewell represented two Waste Management entities against civil penalty claims brought by Harris County, Texas and the State of Texas for more than $5 billion arising from the alleged pollution of the San Jacinto River. Bracewell first secured complete dismissal of the claims against the parent company, Waste Management, Inc., on summary judgment before trial. Bracewell then represented Waste Management of Texas as co-counsel in the ensuing five-week trial. Immediately before closing arguments, the government settled with Waste Management of Texas for less than 1% of the amount of penalty it had requested during trial. Texas Lawbook called the trial “one of the greatest defense verdicts in Texas history.”


View All Lawyers





Past Events

Albright to Speak at Advanced Patent Litigation Course

Horseshoe Bay Resort
200 Hi Circle North
Horseshoe Bay, TX
United States

July 21, 2017
View More